Cognitive Scoring Matrix
Every thinking tool and recipe in the Brainstorm Reactor is indexed along a 3-dimensional cognitive taxonomy. Rather than relying on generic keyword search, the platform mathematically quantifies how each method thinks — enabling real-time method recommendation and model-slot matching.
In the left sidebar (Core Console), this framework manifests as an interactive 2D Targeting Matrix.
1. The Three Cognitive Dimensions
Each method in the library is scored on a scale from 0 to 100 across three fundamental axes:
| Dimension | Axis Focus | What It Measures | Score 100 Example |
|---|---|---|---|
| Structure | Operational Rigor | Explicit procedural steps, strict XML tags, output schemas, and bounded rules. | TRIZ Contradiction Matrix, Formal FMEA |
| Divergent | Lateral Exploration | Creative breadth, unexpected analogies, paradigm disruption, and random stimuli. | Brian Eno Oblique Strategies, SCAMPER |
| Convergent | Analytical Synthesis | Multi-step deductive logic, epistemic validation, contradiction pruning, and trade-off evaluation. | First Principles Audit, Socratic Inquest |
2. The 2D Targeting Plane (Core Console)
When navigating the Core Console in the sidebar, you interact with a continuous 2D plane:
- Horizontal Axis: Divergence (Exploration & Novelty)
- Vertical Axis: Convergence (Analytical Depth & Synthesis)
Convergence (Logic & Synthesis)
▲
│ [Convergent / Analytical]
│ e.g., First Principles, SWOT
│
───────────────────┼───────────────────► Divergence (Creativity)
│ [Divergent / Lateral]
│ e.g., SCAMPER, Provocation
│
▼Real-Time Fit Calculation
As you move your cursor across the matrix:
- The engine computes the normalized Euclidean distance between your cursor position and the 3D coordinate vector of every available method.
- Methods with the closest match receive the highest Fit Score (%) and are dynamically sorted to the top of your recommendations list.
- This allows you to visually dial in your exact cognitive intent (e.g. "80% Divergent Ideation + 30% Critical Review") without formulating complex search queries.
3. "Optimized for AI" Indicator
Methods with a Structure Score $\geq 95$ carry the dedicated Optimized for AI indicator.
These methods feature mathematically hardened system prompts, explicit error-handling tags, and zero-ambiguity step definitions. When applied to reasoning models (e.g., Claude Opus, DeepSeek R1, GPT-o-series), they yield maximum reliability and near-zero hallucination rates.
4. Model-Aware Slot Routing
The Scoring Matrix also informs how the Brainstorm Reactor assigns backend LLMs in multi-agent recipes:
- High Convergent Methods ($\geq 70$): Automatically routed to
SLOT_LOGIC(Thinking / Reasoning Models with extended inference budgets). - High Divergent Methods ($\geq 70$): Automatically routed to
SLOT_CREATIVE(High-throughput, laterally associative models with elevated temperature profiles). - Structure & Fact Extraction: Routed to
SLOT_SEARCH(Fact-grounded research agents with live web-retrieval capabilities).
Related Documentation
- Core Interface & The Pool — Navigating the sidebar and console
- Direct Mode — Applying methods to single prompts
- Recipe Builder — Chaining scored methods into multi-agent workflows